Go Back   ISPINE.ORG Forum > Main forums > Abstracts and Articles
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Abstracts and Articles Discuss Biomechanical comparison: fusion of 2 vertebrae vs. artificial invertebral disc in the Main forums forums; From: PubMed. J Biomechanics. 2006; 30(4): 766-775. Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-26-2008, 07:16 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 196
Default Biomechanical comparison: fusion of 2 vertebrae vs. artificial invertebral disc

From: PubMed. J Biomechanics. 2006; 30(4): 766-775.

Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc
Denoziere G, Ku DN

Abstract
Surgical treatments for lower back pain can be distributed into two main groups: fusion (arthrodesis) and disc replacement (arthroplasty). The objective of this study was to compare, under severe loading conditions, the biomechanics of the lumbar spine treated either by fusion or total disc replacement (TDR). A three-dimensional model of a two-level ligamentous lumbar segment was created and simulated through static analyses with the finite-element method (FEM) software ABAQUS. The model was validated by comparing mobility, pressure on the facets, force in the ligaments, maximum stresses, disc bulge, and endplate deflection with measured data given in the literature. The FEM analysis predicted that the mobility of the model after arthrodesis on the upper level was reduced in all rotational degrees of freedom by an average of approximately 44%, relative to healthy normal discs. Conversely, the mobility of the model after TDR on the upper level was increased in all rotational degrees of freedom by an average of approximately 52%. The level implanted with the artificial disc showed excessive ligament tensions (greater than 500 N), high facet pressures (greater than 3 MPa), and a high risk of instability. The mobility and the stresses in the level adjacent to the arthroplasty were also increased. In conclusion, the model for an implanted movable artificial disc illustrated complications common to spinal arthroplasty and showed greater risk of instability and further degeneration than predicted for the fused model. This modeling technique provides an accurate means for assessing potential biomechanical risks and can be used to improve the design of future artificial intervertebral discs.

Keywords: lumbar spine; finite element method; artificial disc; fusion; total disc replacement; LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; LOW-BACK-PAIN; FINITE-ELEMENT; STRESS-ANALYSIS; END-PLATE; FACET ARTICULATION; FLEXION-EXTENSION; TRABECULAR BONE; MOTION SEGMENT; SPINE FUSION
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.