Go Back   ISPINE.ORG Forum > Main forums > iSpine
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

iSpine Discuss Biophosphanates and ADR or fusion in the Main forums forums; Regarding Dexa scans, it is very important that subsequent scans be made using the same equipment, and the same operator, ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2010, 05:06 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71
Default bone density

Regarding Dexa scans, it is very important that subsequent scans be made using the same equipment, and the same operator, if possible, as your first scan.

FYI.... I have been on Fosamax for almost five years now following my first ADR (3-level lumbar) surgery. During this surgery my bones were reported to be very soft. Following surgery, I had a Dexa scan - results were osteopenia (-2.1 lumbar). Results have improved to within normal range as of last November. Results were -1.7 after the first year, so for me, Fosamax works.
Incidentally, I had a 2-level cervical ADR in 2007 with no subsidence or post-surgical structural events of any kind.

My bone specialist explained to me that the question of "brittle bones" as a result of Fosamax use is impossible. Biophosphates, he said, can not change the way your body builds bone; it only changes (slows down) the natural reabsorption rate of bone within one's body.

-Jeff
__________________
19+ years back pain w/ advancing disc degeneration.
2002-2 level lumbar IDET w/ Nucleoplasty (very unsuccessful; huge setback)
Three level lumbar Charite (L3/4, L4/5, L5/S1) with Dr. Zeegers in Munich, Germany: 2/25/05 (successful)
Two level cervical Mobi-C (C5/6, C6/7) 2/2/07 with Dr. Zeegers (successful)
Laser Facet Coagulation (left side: L3/4, L4/5, L5/S1 & sacral) 11/04/10 with Prof. Dr. Reul / Beta Klinik (significant reduction in remnant lumbar & sacral pain)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2010, 08:23 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: arizona
Posts: 256
Default

Jeff:
Thanks for the info--as my PCP indicated, the literature on biophosphanates is confusing and often contradictory. You certainly had a dramatic improvement with the Fossamax, which is terrific. Were you able to have DEXA scans with the ADR's and if so, did they have to make any adjustments? I'm asking because when I went for my scan, they asked if I had any metal in my body and when I indicated that I had a cervical ADR, the response was that the scan wouldn't be near there so it was a non-issue. I am kicking myself now for missing an opportunity to glean some information about this...

From your and Maria's experience, I guess I am leaning towards remaining on the Actonel...
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2010, 08:54 PM
ans ans is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 362
Default

Glad Fosomax helped you! I thought this Rx kept bone density at a stable level unlike Forteo which I heard "grew" bone.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2010, 01:08 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,405
Default re my actonel vacation

I don't consider it a wise move. It was stupid in fact because I already had osteopenia in my spine and hip but I felt like it was bothering me when I took it altho I think that I just didn't have a good grip on my GERD at the time.

Oh well investigate this vacation idea fully before implementing it would be my suggestion...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.