Go Back   ISPINE.ORG Forum > Main forums > Surgical Outcomes and Blogs
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Surgical Outcomes and Blogs Discuss Pro-Disc C5-C6 **Please help** Placement? in the Main forums forums; Is my disc in right? too small? forward? At 4 months post op my neck pain is far worse then ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-31-2010, 12:36 PM
JKDE302's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 65
Default Pro-Disc C5-C6 **Please help** Placement?

Is my disc in right? too small? forward?

At 4 months post op my neck pain is far worse then before surgery.

Please help advise me.








__________________
C4-5: Mild disc height loss with central annular fissure. Small broad-based left paracentral disc protrusion. Moderate central canal stenosis-the disc protrusion abuts and mildly flattens the left ventral surface of the spinal canal.

C5-6: Disc desiccation with mild height loss.Diffuse discosteophyte bulge and uncovertebral joint hypertrophy, moderate central canal stenosis- Severe neuroforaminal stenosis bilaterally, right greater than left.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-01-2010, 12:52 AM
mmglobal's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,511
Default

It is what it is. It looks like the joint is functioning as the relative angle of the plates moves as expected with flexion/extension.

IMHO, if the pain us unchanged or the same pain is worse after surgery, the pain generator was somewhere else and looking at the implantation is a distraction. (no pun intended)

What did C3-4 look like on MRI? discography?

Your disc is not subsided. If it looks the same as it did in the interoperative or immediate post-op images, then it's not migrated.

What were your symptoms like pre and post-op?
__________________
1997 MVA
2000 L4-5 Microdiscectomy/laminotomy
2001 L5-S1 Micro-d/lami
2002 L4-S1 Charite' ADR - SUCCESS!
2009 C3-C4, C5-C6-C7, T1-T2 ProDisc-C Nova
Summer 2009, more bad thoracic discs!
Life After Surgery Website
President: Global Patient Network, Inc.
Founder: www.iSpine.org
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-01-2010, 04:16 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 53
Default

Have you tried facet injections at the C5-C6 level on the side your experiencing neck pain?

You listed C4-C5 as having some issues. Could that level have progressed and have become a pain generator?

Is your neck pain at the side of your neck or lower down at the Levator or Trap area?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-01-2010, 07:18 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 111
Default

It looks a little off centre...closer to RT side, and a little taller than the natural disc height. But maybe within the acceptable parameters? I'm no expert.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-01-2010, 01:18 PM
JKDE302's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 65
Default

Thank you everyone...

My C3-C4 had a small bulge/stenosis and is probally getting worse..

My C4-C5 is undoubtedly dessicated w/stenosis and getting worse.

All my pain is in the back of my neck, I get more relief from mobic then percocet. My neuro here in delaware had NOT done alot of ADR's but since im only 30 he didnt want to fuse me. I have medicaid and could not get a 2 level. I have DDD in my low back also so i guess it is what it is.

All your advice is greatly appreciated. Thank you my spine friends...

Im going to post my full Neck MRI later today.
__________________
C4-5: Mild disc height loss with central annular fissure. Small broad-based left paracentral disc protrusion. Moderate central canal stenosis-the disc protrusion abuts and mildly flattens the left ventral surface of the spinal canal.

C5-6: Disc desiccation with mild height loss.Diffuse discosteophyte bulge and uncovertebral joint hypertrophy, moderate central canal stenosis- Severe neuroforaminal stenosis bilaterally, right greater than left.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2010, 12:24 AM
mmglobal's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,511
Default

is your pain your pre-op pain or is it changed? did pre-op pains get better and these pains are new?

was discography done?

Based on what you've said, it sounds like you needed a 2 or 3-level surgery and you got what the doctor could do instead of what he thought you needed???
__________________
1997 MVA
2000 L4-5 Microdiscectomy/laminotomy
2001 L5-S1 Micro-d/lami
2002 L4-S1 Charite' ADR - SUCCESS!
2009 C3-C4, C5-C6-C7, T1-T2 ProDisc-C Nova
Summer 2009, more bad thoracic discs!
Life After Surgery Website
President: Global Patient Network, Inc.
Founder: www.iSpine.org
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-15-2010, 09:20 PM
JKDE302's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 65
Default

Just got a cat csan today at 5 months...

Please help advise me...

__________________
C4-5: Mild disc height loss with central annular fissure. Small broad-based left paracentral disc protrusion. Moderate central canal stenosis-the disc protrusion abuts and mildly flattens the left ventral surface of the spinal canal.

C5-6: Disc desiccation with mild height loss.Diffuse discosteophyte bulge and uncovertebral joint hypertrophy, moderate central canal stenosis- Severe neuroforaminal stenosis bilaterally, right greater than left.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-15-2010, 10:08 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,405
Default after surgery

It's stated in the opening question posed that pain is far worse post surgery (4 months now). All in back of neck.

I wonder if you had multi level probs and got a one level ADR if that offset the structural balance that you previously had prior to surgery so the pain is an adjustment to one level being worked on. Surgery level may actually be Ok tho other levels are reactive re surgical intervention?

Of course I know nothing regarding this just am thinking this as a possibility because of what you mentioned re the other levels.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2010, 07:37 PM
JKDE302's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 65
Default

Here is my 5 month X-Ray...

Is my Pro-Disc to Forward?



__________________
C4-5: Mild disc height loss with central annular fissure. Small broad-based left paracentral disc protrusion. Moderate central canal stenosis-the disc protrusion abuts and mildly flattens the left ventral surface of the spinal canal.

C5-6: Disc desiccation with mild height loss.Diffuse discosteophyte bulge and uncovertebral joint hypertrophy, moderate central canal stenosis- Severe neuroforaminal stenosis bilaterally, right greater than left.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-06-2010, 04:16 PM
mmglobal's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,511
Default

If it's not in an optimum position, that doesn't mean it's a problem. Many people have sub-optimum placement without having problems. (Sadly, some surgeons see this as an excuse to accept poor placement as 'good enough'.)

I don't know if you ever answered... is your pain the same as your pre-op pain, similar, or completely different?

Mark
__________________
1997 MVA
2000 L4-5 Microdiscectomy/laminotomy
2001 L5-S1 Micro-d/lami
2002 L4-S1 Charite' ADR - SUCCESS!
2009 C3-C4, C5-C6-C7, T1-T2 ProDisc-C Nova
Summer 2009, more bad thoracic discs!
Life After Surgery Website
President: Global Patient Network, Inc.
Founder: www.iSpine.org
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 07-25-2011, 05:27 PM
JKDE302's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 65
Default

Could this surgery have caused me fibromylagia or does cervical stenosis and arthritis feel the same?
__________________
C4-5: Mild disc height loss with central annular fissure. Small broad-based left paracentral disc protrusion. Moderate central canal stenosis-the disc protrusion abuts and mildly flattens the left ventral surface of the spinal canal.

C5-6: Disc desiccation with mild height loss.Diffuse discosteophyte bulge and uncovertebral joint hypertrophy, moderate central canal stenosis- Severe neuroforaminal stenosis bilaterally, right greater than left.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 07-25-2011, 06:10 PM
dshobbies's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,596
Default

Just wondering if you've seen a neurologist for the source of your pain? What about a pain management specialist?
__________________
3 level Prodisc adr S1-L3, Oct 12, 2005
Dr. B in Bogen, Germany
Severe nerve damage in left leg, still working on it
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2011, 06:30 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 120
Default



The "surgeon" cut the keel slot wrong. The implant is tilted as is your spine. It changes the vectors of all your vertebra.

He also did not prepare the surfaces correctly. That is another reason it is tipped. Think of it like this. You install a door and the hinges are not plumb and square. It may close OK and look fine but when you open it more than 1/2 way it scrapes on the floor.

It looks to me that the joker who did this was more than sloppy.


Here is what you need. Even a bonehead like the bonehead who did your surgery could put this in without screwing up. The can't put it in wrong if they prepare the surfaces properly and they know how to use a drill and a screw driver. Even if they do a sloppy job the Neo Disk is forgiving.

BTW, what is the name of the dork who did this to you?
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2011, 06:48 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 120
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JKDE302 View Post
Here is my 5 month X-Ray...

Is my Pro-Disc to Forward?



You have big osteophytes.

You lost the lordosis curve.



This is a healthy C-spine. Notice the nice curve. I your X rays the vertebra are all over the place. The vertebrae below the implant are in the correct position. The ones above it are tilted and twisted. This will cause nerve irritation and lots of pain. If you butcher/surgeon can't figure that out key his BMW.

Call a lawyer! Get a chiropractor to look at your films. He will tell you the same thing I told you but without the hyperbole.

Also the implant is TOO BIG!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2011, 06:58 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 120
Default



Notice how your left shoulder has pulled up and how your collar bone is distorted.

That disk has made your spine bent and twisted. It is too big and it was put in wrong. You are probably having pain where you never had it before. IMO it you don't get this piece of improperly installed junk removed you will never get better.

I hope the creep who did this to you gets cancer.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2011, 06:33 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sierra Madre, California
Posts: 904
Default

ADR seeker where or how did you learn to interpret xrays so well?. I really want to learn. I do love to learn and am especially interested in medicine.
judy
__________________










2007 ACDF 4-7
2008 hip , knee scope, hip replacement
2009 thoracic T-5 thru T-11fusion
2009 VATS T7-8, posterior only T11-12. removal of thoracic hard wear
2010 lung surgery
2010 T2-L2 kyphosis correction
2010 Kyphoplasty T-3, T-4
2011 Cervical osteotomy ,revision C4-T5
2011 Foot surgery
2011 Revision fusion T7 thru L4/laminectomy
2012 Hammertoe correction left foot
2012 Revision fusion T-12 thru L5
2012 Revision fusion L4-L5
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 09-24-2011, 12:03 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 120
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsewell View Post
ADR seeker where or how did you learn to interpret xrays so well?. I really want to learn. I do love to learn and am especially interested in medicine.
judy
A chiropractor explained things to me. An atlas chiropractor uses very precise measurements when determining vectors for adjustments. They actually use a grease pencil on the X rays.

The films here show a very subluxated C-spine above the 5-6 level and IMO the cause is a poorly implanted Frankenstien disk.

Ball and socket ADRs probably are not as good as a fusion. A real disk is motion limiting but the old style ADRs over rotate and move to far in flexion and extension. The neck moves at that level because there is no resistance.

If the curve gets flattened like in the Xray images there will be all sorts of pain and the surgeon will not connect the dots and when you ask you will get pain meds, vague answers dumb looks and 6 weeks of PT which will me a waste of time in most cases.

I am not a doctor but it dosen't take a doctor to see that this was a butcher job. If you have an honest and competent primary care doctor he will look at your films as a courtesy and if he does he will send you to a good doctor, chiropractor and a good medical malpractice lawyer.

In a nutshell here's the problem as I see it. The Pro Disc is junk and the surgery looks like it was done by a drunk paraplegic.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 09-24-2011, 07:10 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,405
Default what it looks like

My eye is very untrained but it does look like your upper cervical levels are twisted or torqued and whether they were that way before the ADR placement or not may make a difference as well in terms of feeling worse post operatively as you state.

You mentioned you're medicaid and one level was done while possibly 3 levels had problems. Did your surgeon want to address the worse level and hope the two above would get relief (wondering if you were told this)?

Seems like the ADR is tilted and the disc space jacked up but that's just to me which means nothing except if I saw this on my own films I'd think maybe that was increasing the probs/pain in the levels that weren't treated and are kind of messed up.

ADRseeker has a colorful way of explaining things which while makes sense seems a bit harsh to me however does seem to make sense re what the chiropractor friend explained.

You mentioned you're on medicaid. Did you have HMO insurance that refers you to certain specialist or were you able to choose the specialist on your own? I'm just wondering about this in terms of follow up type of care re your insurance. Insurance limitations can really do a number on the type of followup and limitations we as patients are dealt.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 10-17-2011, 12:59 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3
Cool

If you are still stuck without answers, I recommend you at least consult with Dr. Zeegers and maybe invest in a trip to Germany for imaging and diagnostics, if not more and better surgery.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 10-25-2011, 07:05 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 120
Default

The surgeon who did this was a hack. The lodorsis is gone. Your head is tilted indicating that you atlas aka C-1 in tilted. MDs were were not in anatomy and physiology class when they discussed the atlas.

I commented on this before. There may be a fix for you. Your atlas is way out of alignment and it probably was long before Dr Frankenstien got to you. You may be able do salvage this. Hear me out.

I am a huge advocate of atlas othogonal chiropractic. They don't twist and crack your spine. They use gentle activators and a percussion instrument that are safe. When they get you "head on straight" some of the problems may resolve. Try it. It's very inexpensive and it won't hurt you.

All your structure look OK except for the bone spurs and some facet arthritis. It could be mostly a soft tissue problem that is distorting your spine. Even if you need a redo have an aligned spine will make the surgery go better.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 10-25-2011, 10:07 PM
mmglobal's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,511
Default

Again, IMHO while the implantation may not be optimum, it is not that bad. I have seen much worse with successful outcomes. We don't know what compromises were NECESSARY in the implantation that resulted in the final configuration looking like it does.

The lordosis being lost is because of the levels above the ADR, not due to the ADR.

The CT image leads me to believe that some subsidence could be resulting in the tilt that is shown, but it is not very clear on the xrays.

Calling the surgeon a hack does no one any good. It's easy to assume things and take shots, but it's not helpful.

Mark
__________________
1997 MVA
2000 L4-5 Microdiscectomy/laminotomy
2001 L5-S1 Micro-d/lami
2002 L4-S1 Charite' ADR - SUCCESS!
2009 C3-C4, C5-C6-C7, T1-T2 ProDisc-C Nova
Summer 2009, more bad thoracic discs!
Life After Surgery Website
President: Global Patient Network, Inc.
Founder: www.iSpine.org
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2011, 01:31 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 120
Default



Look at the height of the disk spaces and then look at the height of the ADR. It looks like he put in a lumbar disk. That would explain the loss of the lordosis curve. Do you have any pre surgery films. If the disk is too big you might have a lawsuit.



Here is a properly done ADR. Notice that the height is right and the curve is maintained. You got butchered.

Last edited by ADR seeker; 10-26-2011 at 02:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.