View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 02-17-2011, 04:42 AM
mmglobal's Avatar
mmglobal mmglobal is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,511
Default

IMHO, artificial discs forced the medical community to do a better job of correctly diagnosing the pain generators, rather than just treating the levels that looked worse on imaging. The demands of remobilizing the system are greater and do require much more accurate diagnosis. (Read this as embracing discography!)

The increased accuracy of diagnosis for ADR has had benefits in fusion technology as well... better diagnosis means more successful surgeries... or less failures.

Off the soap box now...

Mark
__________________
1997 MVA
2000 L4-5 Microdiscectomy/laminotomy
2001 L5-S1 Micro-d/lami
2002 L4-S1 Charite' ADR - SUCCESS!
2009 C3-C4, C5-C6-C7, T1-T2 ProDisc-C Nova
Summer 2009, more bad thoracic discs!
Life After Surgery Website
President: Global Patient Network, Inc.
Founder: www.iSpine.org
Reply With Quote