Mark: 
You've piqued my curiosity about the difference in instrumentation... 
 
The EMG findings are indeed exciting and important given the background to the decision to have surgery: I've been sitting on the fence, dealing with these cervical issues for just about 7 years, but what pushed the issue was having a repeat EMG a year ago which showed changes from prior studies and definitely demonstrated radiculopathy for the first time.  But then the neurologist who did the pre-surgery EMG's insisted that the nerve damage was permanent and therefore I should not have surgery.  I decided to go ahead with the surgery anyway and it looks like I made the right decision--I don't have the complete EMG report from the surgery so there may indeed be at least some permanent damage but it looks like at least some damage was indeed reversible.   
 
I think this is an important and hopeful piece of information for others who are also on the fence and/or having neurologists claiming to knowledge they may not really have. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				  
				
					
						Last edited by sahuaro; 02-01-2008 at 09:57 PM.
					
					
						Reason: typo
					
				
			
		
		
		
	
	 |