View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-12-2008, 08:51 PM
mmglobal's Avatar
mmglobal mmglobal is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,511
Default

Ray,

I have many clients with Mobi-C procedures done. It's an interesting device. While the materials are similar to the other poly-core ADR's, the design is somewhat different. The highly mobile core allows the joint to discover it's own 'center'; while stationary core, ball and socket devices like the ProDisc-C will provide centering force that will tend to keep things more aligned based on the location of the prosthesis. As with all of the differences from one device to the next, they come with advantages and disadvantages. Also, the advantages and disadvantages may be different for different applications. What may be better at one level, may be a disadvantage in a big multi-level contstruct.

There is much to think about and unfortunately, the answers to many questions may not be known for some time yet.

Please keep us posted... all the best,

Mark
__________________
1997 MVA
2000 L4-5 Microdiscectomy/laminotomy
2001 L5-S1 Micro-d/lami
2002 L4-S1 Charite' ADR - SUCCESS!
2009 C3-C4, C5-C6-C7, T1-T2 ProDisc-C Nova
Summer 2009, more bad thoracic discs!
Life After Surgery Website
President: Global Patient Network, Inc.
Founder: www.iSpine.org
Reply With Quote