View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-10-2008, 12:55 AM
mmglobal's Avatar
mmglobal mmglobal is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,511
Default

Definately not the same... Zimmer and Synthes separate companies with competing interests. I've seen similar systems for the past several conferences. Some have very interesting twists... others are just ways to get a flexible rod involved in a pedicle screw system.

N Spine’s NFlex/NFix II - (From ChinaBioToday.com.)


Zimmer's Dynesys / DTO - from Zimmer's website:


I had a very interesting discussion on Saturday with Dr. Bertagnoli about the various designs... pros and cons. These devices are pretty new... the fusion capabilities of the pedicle screw systems are well known. It turns out that they get FDA approval WITHOUT clinical trials for these new devices that are marketed to the patients as motion preservation technology, because the flexible systems actually speed the fusion process. (That is when fusion is the intention and cages, bone graft, BMP and other fusion technologies are employed.)

I hope this is helpful,

Mark
__________________
1997 MVA
2000 L4-5 Microdiscectomy/laminotomy
2001 L5-S1 Micro-d/lami
2002 L4-S1 Charite' ADR - SUCCESS!
2009 C3-C4, C5-C6-C7, T1-T2 ProDisc-C Nova
Summer 2009, more bad thoracic discs!
Life After Surgery Website
President: Global Patient Network, Inc.
Founder: www.iSpine.org
Reply With Quote