Go Back   ISPINE.ORG Forum > Main forums > Abstracts and Articles
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Abstracts and Articles Discuss Intervertebral disc replacement for cervical degenerative disease in the Main forums forums; From: PubMed. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008 May;150(5):453-9; discussion 459. Intervertebral disc replacement for cervical degenerative disease--...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-26-2008, 06:50 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 196
Default Intervertebral disc replacement for cervical degenerative disease

From: PubMed. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008 May;150(5):453-9; discussion 459.

Intervertebral disc replacement for cervical degenerative disease--clinical results and functional outcome at two years in patients implanted with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis
Heidecke V, Burkert W, Brucke M, Rainov NG.

Abstract
BACKGROUND: This is a prospective study of patients with degenerative cervical disease who underwent ventral discectomy and disc replacement with the Bryan((R)) cervical disc prosthesis. The objective was to investigate clinical outcome at 2 years of patients implanted with the Bryan disc and to evaluate function of the implant itself.
METHODS: Fifty-four consecutive patients with cervical disc herniation and/or spondylosis with preserved mobility in the affected spinal segments were enrolled. Patients presented clinically with cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy with or without neck pain. A standard anterior cervical discectomy was carried out and a Bryan disc was implanted in the affected levels. A total of 59 prosthetic discs were implanted, in 49 patients at a single level and in 5 at two adjacent levels. The neurological status was evaluated pre-operatively and at one and two years thereafter. Plain X-rays, CT, and MRI were used for pre-operative diagnostics. Post-operative follow-up was done by X-rays.
FINDINGS: All patients had an excellent or good neurological outcome according to the Odom criteria. Loss of function (motion range <3 degrees) was found in 7 (12%) out of 59 Bryan discs at two years after surgery. Heterotopic ossification (HO) of the McAffee grades 1-4 was seen in a total of 17 (29%) segments. There were no implant dislocations or migrations.
CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of the Bryan disc resulted in excellent or good neurological outcome in all patients. The surgical technique was safe and without complications. Twelve percent of the implanted Bryan discs lost mobility at two years, mainly due to HO. A trend was seen towards development of HO in the operated segments. Further investigations with longer follow-up periods and with a control group (e.g. fusion with intervertebral cage) will be necessary for a definitive assessment of the long-term functionality and benefits of artificial cervical discs.

Keywords: Bryan (R) disc; cervical degenerative disc disease; anterior approach; ventral discectomy; ARTHROPLASTY; FUSION; COMPLICATIONS; MYELOPATHY; ADJACENT; SEGMENT
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.