Go Back   ISPINE.ORG Forum > Main forums > iSpine
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

iSpine Discuss Bone source in some lumbar fusion procedures in the Main forums forums; In lumbar spine fusion, such as L4/L5, many Drs pack bone between the spinous processes on either side to ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2012, 11:54 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2
Default Bone source in some lumbar fusion procedures

In lumbar spine fusion, such as L4/L5, many Drs pack bone between the spinous processes on either side to form a bridge between vertebrae. The bone can come from the patient's hip or from a mixture of precursor bone. Can anyone say what they use for the precursor bone material? The advantage of using it instead of hip bone is that the hip is not subjected to trauma. Which approach is best (i.e. patients bone or outside source) and the trade-offs? Anyone know of other threads or reference links on this? Thanks.

Fred, mmglobal here. Your post (below) was made in the Abstracts and Articles forum. Since it is essentially the same question you posted above, and because it is not an abstract or article; I merged the 2 threads into one, here in the main (iSpine) forum. I hoep you don't mind. Mark

Quote:
Originally Posted by fredf View Post
I would like to find out what Drs use as bone precursor material in procedures where they make a bone bridge between spinous processes in L4/L5 lumbar spine fusion. What is the trade-off between this and using bone from the patient's hip? I know it avoids trauma to the hip but is it as good? of better? Thanks.

Last edited by mmglobal; 06-30-2012 at 05:12 PM. Reason: merge 2 identical questions in 2 forums
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2012, 03:52 AM
mmglobal's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,511
Default

I've spoken to many lumbar fusion patients who complain that "the new hip pain at the harvest site is worse than my old back pain". I have also spoken to many surgeons who firmly believe that the best fusion rate will be accomplished with autograft. (autograft is harvested from YOU, were allograft comes from a donor. (they don't need it anymore.)

There are many products designed to improve fusion options. Some are as simple as developing a usable synthetic bone graft material, or a sophisticated as Bone Morphogenic Protein (BMP). These new products are expensive. Many surgeons are early adopters of these new technologirs, while others are uncomfortable with the unknowns of the new products. The skeptical ones have seen too many examples of seemingly wonderful technology that turns out to be a horror.j
__________________
1997 MVA
2000 L4-5 Microdiscectomy/laminotomy
2001 L5-S1 Micro-d/lami
2002 L4-S1 Charite' ADR - SUCCESS!
2009 C3-C4, C5-C6-C7, T1-T2 ProDisc-C Nova
Summer 2009, more bad thoracic discs!
Life After Surgery Website
President: Global Patient Network, Inc.
Founder: www.iSpine.org
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2012, 02:27 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NY
Posts: 38
Default

Don't mean to hijack, but what exactly is a fusion? I have heard bad things about it, and am not sure it is for me, though I definitely need surgery.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
fusion, lumbar


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.