View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 06-15-2008, 03:09 PM
mmglobal's Avatar
mmglobal mmglobal is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,511
Default

Roblin,

I may very well be wrong about this, but my impression is that we'd be talking about numbers that could be counted on a finger or two.

I believe that if you are talking a 2-level revision, it would be a moot point. They can't do L5-S1 with a lateral approach. The XLIF approach includes an osteomoty to remove the bone on one side of the keel. That may be easier to do with anterior approach, eliminating the need for lateral approach. Another advantage of already being there for anterior approach is that it may be possible to safely expose L4-5 enough so that the prosthesis may be removed without osteotomy.

Obviously, this comes with all the "I'm not a doctor" disclaimers... this is just my 'laypersons' understanding based on my experiences.

Mark
__________________
1997 MVA
2000 L4-5 Microdiscectomy/laminotomy
2001 L5-S1 Micro-d/lami
2002 L4-S1 Charite' ADR - SUCCESS!
2009 C3-C4, C5-C6-C7, T1-T2 ProDisc-C Nova
Summer 2009, more bad thoracic discs!
Life After Surgery Website
President: Global Patient Network, Inc.
Founder: www.iSpine.org
Reply With Quote