View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2008, 09:27 AM
B13s's Avatar
B13s B13s is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 42
Send a message via ICQ to B13s
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mmglobal View Post
B13, that number might be interesting, but it would not be meaningful. These forums, like my client base have artificially inflated numbers of failures. A highly successful patient does not seek me out to tell me that they are doing wonderfully. The successful patients are not spending their days on the internet posting their woes.

I'm reviving the paremeterized surgical outcomes thread that I started 5 years ago and that will produce some interesting data. Even with that, the data should not be used for decision making process unless there is a way to 'grade' the patients. If a surgeon is unwilling to take a difficult patient and only 'cherry picks' his results will appear better. The surgeon who is willing to take the 'basket cases' may have results that don't look as good, but are actually far better in many ways.

Mark
What I mean how many of out your clients that had ADR's with you need revision, not counting the ones that contacted you just because of the revision having their ADR's implanted before.
__________________
2006-2009 on/off burning leg pain
07.2006 Microdiscectomy
04.2004 Herniation L5-S1
Reply With Quote